On Sep 2, 1:44 pm, sh...@xenon.Stanford.EDU (VS) wrote:
> In article <1188661427.065066.130...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>
> wrote:
> >>My, and it seems like only yesterday our resident licensed attorney,
> >>PaulTauger, was advising us that an e-ticket is not a written
> >>contract, and that the statute of frauds precludes enforcement
> >>of non-written contracts. I wonder if they changed the statute of
> >>frauds since then, or if IATA is in violation.
>
> >Still think you know more law than a lawyer?
>
> Not ``think,'' I *know* that I know more about e-tickets than some
> once-a-year-to-Vegas traveler who presumes that his degree from Brooklyn
> Academy of Law gives the force of law to any random opinion he happens
> to hold.
>
> >When we had this discussion in 2000, the context was e-tickets that
> >weren't booked on line, but on the phone.
>
> The context was your ridiculous claim that (quote) ``an e-ticket is not
> a written contract,'' followed by a long blovation that any opinion
> of yours about e-tickets must be correct because you are a Licensed
> Attorney (TM)... even though it was blindingly clear that you knew
> bugger-all about e-tickets and how they work. E-tickets were written
> contracts back in 2000, and they still are.
>
> Out of curiosity, have you made partner yet?
You haven't a clue, have you? Spend some time on google and then see
what you have to say, both about "Brooklyn Academy of Law," where I
practice law, what position I hold and whether I am a "once-a-year
traveler to Las Vegas.
Don't you ever tire of being wrong?
E-tickets are not written contracts if there is no writing, and there
is no writing when they are booked by phone. You do know the
definition of "writing," don't you?
By the way, where is your law degree from? Where are you authorized
to practice law?
|