Padraig Breathnach wrote:
> Iceman wrote:
>
> >On Sep 3, 9:23 am, Padraig Breathnach wrote:
> >> Currently I am leaning towards Ku'damm, but nothing is decided.
> >
> >
> >The Ku'damm area is not interesting at all. The Ku'damm itself is an
> >unexceptional shopping street, and the nondescript area around it
> >could be anywhere in Europe.
> >
> Noted.
>
> >Most of the museums and historic sights are in the Mitte area, while
> >the most interesting neighborhoods to explore are Prenzlauer Berg and
> >Friedrichshain. I'd recommend staying in Mitte for its proximity to
> >the sights and its central location - but if you aren't really
> >interested in the sights and would rather just see the modern city
> >then you might want to stay in Prenzlauer Berg.
> >
> It's November we're discussing. Yes to museums and indoor tourism.
How bad would it be? I actually enjoyed walking around quite a bit when
I was there (early March, a few years ago.) Despite the low
temperatures, there were plenty of people on the streets- even a bit of
outdoor food available- i.e. wurst etc. If it's not raining/snowing, I
wouldn't worry too much about being outdoors.
--
(*) ... of the royal duchy of city south and deansgate
http://www.davidhorne.net - real address on website
"He can't be as stupid as he looks, but nevertheless he probably
is quite a stupid man." Richard Dawkins on Pres. Bush" |
986669. Re: Berlin, November
986685. Re: Berlin, November
986686. Re: Berlin, November
986689. Re: Berlin, November
986772. Re: Berlin, November
986773. Re: Berlin, November
986811. Re: Berlin, November
987079. Re: Berlin, November
987185. Re: Berlin, November
987187. Re: Berlin, November
987237. Re: Berlin, November
987242. Re: Berlin, November
987259. Re: Berlin, November
987265. Re: Berlin, November
987266. Re: Berlin, November
987267. Re: Berlin, November
987274. Re: Berlin, November
987275. Re: Berlin, November
987276. Re: Berlin, November
987277. Re: Berlin, November
|
|
|