On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:04:52 GMT, "a.spencer3" wrote:
>
>"William Black" wrote in message
>news:fe31k5$867$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>>
>> "James Silverton" wrote in message
>> news:X27Ni.8226$P06.5830@trnddc05...
>> > William wrote on Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:01:14 +0100:
>> >
>> >
>> > WB> "James Silverton" wrote in
>> > WB> message news:wt5Ni.3553$6Y5.1646@trnddc07...
>> > ??>> Hello, All!
>> > ??>>
>> > ??>> I have gotten accustomed tho' not resigned to London
>> > ??>> restaurant prices: same numbers but pounds not dollars. This
>> > ??>> seems to extend to other things. There was an ad today on
>> > ??>> the web page of "The Guardian" for a film scanner at GBP
>> > ??>> 99.95, which is probably supposed to be a bargain. There
>> > ??>> was an ad for the same thing in "The Washington Post" a
>> > ??>> month ago for USD 99.95!
>> >
>> > WB> Who buys stuff from people who pay to put adverts in
>> > WB> expensive newspapers?
>> >
>> > Do you consider The Guardian an "expensive" newspaper? Living where I
>do,
>> > I don't care to buy it here and only read it on the web.The Washington
>> > Post certainly is not expensive, tho' its price like many US papers is
>> > conditioned by what the market will bear and how much they get from ads.
>>
>> I mean to buy advertising in it...
>>
>
>To sell what?
Anything?
--
Martin
|