On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 21:35:24 +0530, "William Black"
wrote:
>
>"Martin" wrote in message
>news:nmu2l39njn3118rl4tatng3peu6ktbghin@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:09:27 +0100, Mxsmanic wrote:
>>
>>>William Black writes:
>>>
>>>> Besides, you can't afford a modern digital SLR, so how would you know?
>>>
>>>By looking at the results from digital SLRs. They are easy to find on the
>>>Web, and since they are digital, what you see is exactly what came out of
>>>the
>>>camera.
>>
>> What *you* see is totally dependent on *your* eyesight & the condition and
>> type
>> of *your* monitor.
>
>When I want to look at serious pictures I look at prints.
>
>So does everyone else.
>
>Ever heard of 'colour cast'?
Are you joking?
> A decent developing lab can correct the
>'colour bias' inherent in any photographic process, including digital
>sensors.
There are limits to what you can correct when colour is missing.
>
>Nobody but .ographers ever made any serious money with photos on the net.
Who is talking about making money?
--
Martin
|