"Martin" wrote in message
news:tm13l39t150iqhip155ghh4ldmv29pvdl7@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 21:35:24 +0530, "William Black"
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Martin" wrote in message
>>news:nmu2l39njn3118rl4tatng3peu6ktbghin@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:09:27 +0100, Mxsmanic wrote:
>>>
>>>>William Black writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Besides, you can't afford a modern digital SLR, so how would you
>>>>> know?
>>>>
>>>>By looking at the results from digital SLRs. They are easy to find on
>>>>the
>>>>Web, and since they are digital, what you see is exactly what came out
>>>>of
>>>>the
>>>>camera.
>>>
>>> What *you* see is totally dependent on *your* eyesight & the condition
>>> and
>>> type
>>> of *your* monitor.
>>
>>When I want to look at serious pictures I look at prints.
>>
>>So does everyone else.
>>
>>Ever heard of 'colour cast'?
>
> Are you joking?
>
>> A decent developing lab can correct the
>>'colour bias' inherent in any photographic process, including digital
>>sensors.
>
> There are limits to what you can correct when colour is missing.
>
>>
>>Nobody but .ographers ever made any serious money with photos on the
>>net.
>
> Who is talking about making money?
Because you're doing it for either fun or money.
If you're doing it for fun then who cares?
--
William Black
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.
|