National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




Subject: Re: Smokers are killing the planet Posted on: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 19:58:40 -0000


"its Xmas and I've got a book to sell"
wrote in message
news:80fe7f2b-20e2-4457-85aa-669cbf866275@l1g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/12/02/easmoke102.xml
>
> Smoking ban poses new climate threat
>
> By Richard Gray, Science Correspondent
> Last Updated: 12:01am GMT 02/12/2007
>
> Pubs are likely to pump hundreds of thousands of tons of additional
> carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as a result of the smoking ban.

Indeed - something I pointed out in the previous thread.

> Policy advisers predict that emissions from patio heaters in pubs
and
> restaurants will increase from 22,200 tons of greenhouse gases a
year
> to up to 282,000 tons - the equivalent of flying a jumbo jet 171
times
> around the Earth.
>
> Heaters will be used for more than 237 days a year, when outdoor
> temperatures are lower than 15C, says the report, from Market
> Transformation. A further 80,000 tons of carbon dioxide will be
> produced next year by patio heaters in private gardens, according to
> an earlier study by the Energy Saving Trust.
>
> Environmentalists say the heaters must now be banned if Britain is
to
> meet carbon dioxide emission targets.

Yeah, just keep banning things. Why not just ban pubs and have done
with it?

> Tony Juniper, of Friends of the Earth, said: "The impacts of the
> smoking ban are positive, but this should not cause more problems
for
> the environment. Either smokers will have to give up smoking or
simply
> put on a jumper."

Why not just have the common sense to allow pubs to provide smokers
with an enclosed smoking area?

Nah - that's not totalitarian enough, is it.

--
Andy