"Doug Weller" wrote in message
news:jpgevjj5psfa$.kmltg0xt02z6$.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 07:43:55 +0200, Sjoerd wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
>
> > But honestly, the only part of the US where one could have a nice time
for
> > more than 2 days without a car is the city of New York.
>
> I'd say Boston or Chicago have enough for more than 2 days and you
wouldn't
> need a car -- and that is only the cities. Ah, and South Beach in Dade
> County was mentioned, that would be fine.
>
> Doug
Definitely don't go to LA unless you are hiring a car.
San Francisco is easy to get around by Public Transport but I doubt you
could spend 2 weeks there.
I've not been to NYC but I know others who have and they certainly didn't
need a car whilst there. In fact it cost them a fortune to park the car
whilst they were there.
Can't help you with beaches to lie around on. Do you really want to spend
all that money to lie around on a beach? There must be closer and cheaper
beaches than the US. Maybe you could go to Hawaii.
Julie
|