Sylvia Else wrote in message news:<4182c638$0$21989$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>...
> running with scissors wrote:
>
> > Sylvia Else wrote in message news:<4180be76$0$32593$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>...
> >
> >>Pooh Bear wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>John Mazor wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>"OtisWinslow" wrote in message
> >>>>news:aTMfd.3429056$ic1.349493@news.easynews.com...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>I thought the Captain was in charge of making sure the
> >>>>>aircraft was operated safely. Why the hell didn't he intervene
> >>>>>and stop the excessive movement? He just sat there
> >>>>>and watched knowing that it was the wrong action to
> >>>>>take? Sure points the finger at Airbus and AA's training program.
> >>>>
> >>>>Perhaps, but it also reflects the prevailing but erroneous impression among
> >>>>airline pilots that you can't break the airplane with control inputs below
> >>>>maneuvering speed. This was not limited to Airbus products.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Which then begs the question why were airline pilots erroneously under that
> >>>impression ?
> >>
> >>It was a bizarre notion anyway. Fly your airliner below maneuvering
> >>speed. Apply full right aileron, and wait.
> >>
> >>I guarantee you'll have a broken plane.
> >>
> >>Sylvia.
> >
> >
> >
> > not a pilot then!
> >
> > twat.
>
> Are you suggesting that doing that _won't_ give you a broken plane? Or
> just that it won't break the aileron off immediately?
>
> OK - how about pushing the stick back and forth in resonance with the
> wing flexing frequency? Of the longitudinal flexing frequence of the
> cabin (tbe 747 cabin bends very visibly, particularly during the takeoff
> run).
>
> Or aileron movements in resonance with the torsional oscillation
> frequency of the cabin?
>
> Sylvia.
Wota .ing wanker |