Nice pictures but I have the same comment: a bit off: dull, plain contrast,
brownish. No pizaz!
In three words: probably digital uncorrected.
Have you worked with the pictures in a good imaging program, like Paintshop
Pro or Photoshop? Looked at the histogram, twiddled with the colors, etc?
Every, yes every, digital picture needs that, am afraid!
And there is far too much. What are the essential diffences between the
first 8 Machu Picchu pictures? Why would one be interested too look at them
all? Sorry about this blistering comment, but just ask yourself that
question :-)
Have a look at: http://www.vanhulsenbeek.com/Brazil/album0.html
and see what I mean.
Though I have had comments about lack of detail in shadows, skies too blue
etc.
There is always a pay off, as anywhere else in life :-)
Best regards
Sander
Amsterdam
"John" wrote in message
news:b0afa$418344cd$d549c797$32111@news.multikabel.nl...
> What do you mean Off??
> Please explain
>
> John
> "Ross" schreef in bericht
> news:4182acea@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
>> Nice snapshots. The colour is a bit "off". Must be the camera.
>>
>>
>> Ross
>>
>> "John" wrote in message
>> news:4cb5$41828909$d549c797$10579@news.multikabel.nl...
>> > New are the photo's of Peru.
>> >
>> > If you have any questions or comment please let me know.
>> >
>> > Just click on website below
>> > Have fun watching them:
>> >
>> > http://community.webshots.com/user/johnvanzon
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
|