BlackWater wrote:
>
> dbcopper@dolby.edu (urchin) wrote:
>
> >In article , BlackWater
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Do you want your plane flown into the side of a large building ?
> >>
> >> DECIDE ... the inconveniences - and occasional incompetence - of
> >> security measures OR ......
> >
> >
> >What's wrong with having it both ways?
> >Security in the air and on the ground?
>
> Think about it for awhile.
>
> Airliners are relatively isolated "up there" and are loaded
> from central locations. This makes the policing effort much
> easier. GROUND transport though ... wide open, tends to make
> lots of stops in lots of places, crosses the open countryside
> where any twit can park a propane tanker on the tracks.
>
> >Idiot.
>
> Interesting conclusion from someone who didn't even bother
> to think-out his suggested course of action.
Idiot. Take your own advice. "Security in the air and on the ground" - DUH
RT |