National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




Subject: Re: luxury hotel in Chicago? Posted on: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:50:23 GMT

Drake is a little threadbare.
Westin is always good, not "luxurious."
W is great but a bit out of the way.

If you're such a hotshot, then you should stay at the Peninsula or the
Four Seasons.



On 4 Jan 2005 06:39:00 -0800, "Dan" wrote:

>
>Dennis McClendon wrote:
>> oooooooo@graffiti.net wrote:
>> > Which of the following is the most impressive hotel?
>> >
>> > The Fairmont
>> > The Drake
>> > Westin Michigan Ave.
>> > W Hotel, Lakeshore
>>
>> I would say the Fairmont is the nicest, but the Drake is the most
>> impressive. The W is more chic, but for your purposes I would choose
>
>> the Drake's old-line elegance and unbeatable location.
>
>Too bad the Palmer House wasn't on the list. Anyhow, I agree that the
>Fairmont is the nicest and the Drake is the most impressive; however,
>I've heard that many of the rooms in the Drake are fairly small - just
>a bit of warning if you choose to stay there. I always stay with
>friends or family when I'm in Chicago, so I haven't actually stayed at
>any of these places, but I've walked in/through all but the W on
>several occasions.