National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




Subject: Re: Las Vegas lodging alternatives in March Posted on: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:49:33 -0500


"Gianni Rondinini" wrote in message
news:3sehv01q5qld1s1qnb4vcd56ojbe7shkab@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:53:46 -0800, "PTravel"
> wrote:
>
> >> http://www.circuscircus.com
> >> http://www.excalibur.com
> >
> >Without question, among the worst properties on the strip (particularly
>
> it's not the bellagio, but it didn't seem me that bad.
> what's *so* wrong with circus circus? we spent 7 days there in 2
> different travels to usa --4+3 nights-- and we're still alive and
> happy. we had no problems of any kind with that hotel: the only pity
> is that it's so far from the "center" of the strip --and we had to
> walk quite a bit--.
>
> i'm asking just to learn and understand, since we planned to spend 6
> nights in excalibur this summer.
>
> >Circus Circus). The OP would do much better staying at a decent
off-strip
>
> OP = ?


Gianni;

It's not that there are obvious "problems" with Circus Circus and Excalibur,
it is just that they are older properties, geared more to families, and they
are not equivalent in standards to most of the other properties. You will
find more luxurious rooms and facilities at the other name properties. Since
you have been there, you know what you are getting, so you will not have any
issues.

Excalibur is a nicer property than Circus Circus, in my opinion, and it is
certainly better positioned on the strip.

"OP" means "original poster" - the person who made the first post and
started the thread.