In article <1108035574.d22d98d77f6484607be81784b98253f7@teranews>,
Icono Clast wrote:
> Go Fig wrote:
> > IKreiner K. wrote:
> >> Santa Monica . . . Does anyone know of a good web site for
> >> restaurant reviews?
> >
> > CitySearch Los Angeles:
>
> The "Don't-miss Sights in San Francisco page
> at the site at
> Right in the sig contains the following paragraph:
>
> << CAVEAT EMPTOR
> Commercial sites and publications should be regarded with extreme
> skepticism because they are more likely to recommend those who
> advertise with them, regardless of quality, in preference to The Best
> who mightn't advertise with them. Further, such sites and
> publications might not have what you seek only because they do not
> pay to be mentioned. You are advised, regardless of where you travel,
> to ask local people about commercial sites' and publications'
> recommendations. >>
>
> There is a Los Angeles food group called something la.eats that is
> likely to include Santa Monica. The San Francisco version of
> CitySearch, a commercial site, is absolutely worthless and laden with
> inaccuracies! I wouldn't look at it for any town for any reason. I
> advise you to ignore it!
The site has both editorial comments and USER reviews, are the
opinions of "la.eats" more valuable ? Why ?
jay
Thu Feb 10, 2005
mailto:gofig@mac.com
> ____________________________________________________________
> A San Francisco gourmand: "You serve it, I'll eat it!"
> http://geocities.com/dancefest/ http://geocities.com/iconoc/
> ICQ: http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 IClast at SFbay Net |