On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:14:35 -0500, Dave Smith
wrote:
>PTravel wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> The article assumes that the dip in tourism is the result of security
>> procedures. Isn't it also possible that the dip is the result of potential
>> tourists' distaste for recent American actions on the world stage?
>
>Remember when Bush was running down France, Germany, Canada a few few other
>countries that wouldn't join his dirty little war? He didn't seem to care if
>he was offending people. People were offended.
Hey! No tourism dip here! Everyone is still clamoring to come see New
York, especially Europeans who can shop cheaply.
But then we didn't vote for Bush.
Brian |
