In article , miles
wrote:
€ Alan Street wrote:
€
€ > So in other words, no. You have nothing to back up your claims.
€ >
€ > What a suprise.
€ >
€ > Moron.
€
€ YOu don't get it do you! You can't tell me why you disagree. Both of
€ us could easily show a URL to 'backs up' our claims. Does it mean a
€ damn thing? Hell no. It means nothing other than to show your desire
€ for an argument and nothing more.
€
I'm saying that you make up facts and figures to support your position.
Why on earth would I want to have a "discussion" with someone so
dishonest and ineffective?
€ You can't tell me why you disagree. What a suprise.
€
I disagree because my bullshit detector went off. It's not incumbent on
me to prove anything because I didn't make a claim. You made the
(bullshit) claim, you back it up.
As for "finding whatever one wants on the Internet," that's a matter of
source quality. Refereed journals are a good source. FOX news is not.
Newsmax and Talon are worse than FOX. In between there is a whole
spectrum to choose from. Your choice of sources will tell us quite a
bit about the quality of your arguments (although based on your recent
postings, I think we already know).
€ Ah yes, once again the leftists predictable debate tactic known as name
€ calling. Every single time.
Not at all. I regularly debate with intelligent folks who are
conservative. It's great fun and sometimes both sides come away
learning something. But with sophmoric dittoheads like yourself (who,
by the way, make up the vast majority of the right wing voting bloc), I
dispense with the reasoned debate and jump right into showing up the
poster as a fool and a liar. |