miles wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote:
>
>> It's pretty obvious that you have limited exposure to Niagara Falls
>> if all you know about is that small strip that you find so
>> offensive. It is just a few blocks for crying out, so it's not too
>> hard to avoid.
>
> Now wait a sec here. When did I say thats all I know about? You are
> just being plain absurd and argumentative for no apparent reason other
> than ego.
>
>
>> Be realistic. People arriving from out of town need places to stay
>> and to eat. Those hotels and restaurants are packed throughout the
>> tourist season, and the casino has made it a year round attraction. While
>> everyone may not like it, a lot of people do.
>
> Sure alot of people like it. I DON'T. And many other DON'T. Why do
> you have such a problem with some people not liking that stuff?
>
>> Of course not. I was merely responding to your generalization of a
>> very small part of the city as the primary characteristic of a parks
>> system that runs for more than 20 miles and which offers a wide
>> range of things for tourists to see and do. I even listed some of
>> those. Meanwhile, you seemed to have been hung up on that small area
>> that houses the tourists traps that so many tourists flock to..
>
> It is you that is hung up on that area. When I visit "THE FALLS" I do
> not like that area at all. I greatly prefer the USA side of "THE
> FALLS". It has nothing to do with other non falls related sites to
> see.
The US side has the added attraction of overlooking all the walkway and
parkland on the Canadian side, while having your back to industrial ugliness
that is on the US side...
I feel if its the falls you want to see than it is best vied from the
Canadian side.
|