"Tashi" wrote in message
news:TuB4e.906971$8l.403470@pd7tw1no...
> I have never lived in Southern Ont. only NW Ont. I'm tired of the
prairies
> and want to be alot closer to water and green stuff. I choose S. Ont.
> because I have no desire to go anywhere else for the meantime except
> Montreal but that is too far away, perhaps later when I tire of the south.
>
> My job allows me to travel all over Canada providing there is an opening.
> London and Windsor are choices cause I'm #1 on the list, Sarnia is out
> because 1. more than 2 people have told me it sucks there and it's ugly.
> 2. there are no positions in my area of work there.
>
> I would either have to change positions or go to places with a higher
> population.. I want to keep it below 500,000. In smaller places no-one
> gives up/move out of their positions. Where as in Calgary or
> Edmonton/Vancouver/Toronto etc.. those places are so big, turn over is
> great.
>
> Toronto, been there once, don't like it.. never want to go back if I don't
> have to. TO BIG..Vancouver too expensive, too rainy. Calgary, been there
> done that.
>
> I also want somewhere where the cost of living isn't too high.
>
> close to the border is appealing because it's closer and cheaper to fly
> places.
>
> No, not banking :o)
Okay, that all helps.
I think you will find Windsor comes somewhere between Sarnia and London in
visual and lifestyle appeal. It seems I was much more diplomatic on Sarnia
than your other advisors, but you have received sound advice!
Given what appears to be important to you, London would appear to be a
better choice, unless that US airport has to be closer than a couple of
hours away.
|