"Bill Pittman" wrote in message
news:wpittmanDELETE-154F44.12521730052005@syrcnyrdrs-01-ge0.nyroc.rr.com...
> In article
> ,
> "alohacyberian" wrote:
>
>> "Bill Pittman" wrote in message
>> news:wpittmanDELETE-23842A.16513027052005@syrcnyrdrs-02-ge0.nyroc.rr.com...
>> > In article <5GIle.14164$IC6.13466@attbi_s72>,
>> > "Just Dickie" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Rita, You being a New Yorker, let me ask you a question. If you were
>> >> given
>> >> the choice to put your life on the line for a chance at saving all of
>> >> the
>> >> people that perished in the World Trade Center and Pentagon as well as
>> >> the
>> >> flight over PA that crashed, WOULD YOU DO IT? Well, that's what people
>> >> that
>> >> join the military forces here in the good ol' USA make the choice to do
>> >> every day.
>> >
>> > Nope. It has been well publicized that many of the enlistees that were
>> > sent to Iraq HATE that war, and would get out of it if they could. But
>> > what can they do?
>> >
>> > They didn't make that stupid choice (Dubya did), but they're stuck with
>> > it.
>> >
>> Sorry, but you use the word "many" when you mean "few" though you've
>> probably
>> been properly indoctrinated by the elite mainstream media. President Bush,
>> (I
>> hope you don't mind if I eschew your childish name-calling) had the
>> overwhelming support of both houses of Congress and the support of 17
>> enforceable United Nations resolutions (which have not been rescinded to
>> this
>> day) which allowed for armed invasion of Iraq along with the fact that
>> Saddam
>> Hussein and the Iraqi government were in violation of the terms of the
>> Safwan
>> Accords (which were signed by Saddam Hussein himself) which called for
>> armed
>> invasion in the event of their noncompliance: Iraq was not compliant with
>> the
>> Safwan Accords. Saddam was, therefore deposed. So solly. KM
>
> Of course. How stupid of me to think that anyone in the armed forces,
> risking his/her life in Iraq, could POSSIBLY think something different
> from what both houses of Congress thought on a single occasion. How
> stupid, also, for me to think that the atrocities of Saddam don't
> justify ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING to get rid of him, regardless of how
> many US and Iraqi citizens are killed and wounded in the process.
>
Yes, I we can agree that it was stupid of you. Remember, you said it first,
though I'd be the first to agree.
Why such sudden faux concern about the death of American citizens in Iraq
with the equal insouciance about the people killed in the attack on the World
Trade Center? Double standard?
I did notice however, you ignored the United Nations resolutions and the
terms of the Safwan Accords in your eagerness to bash America. If you're so
brilliant, why don't you formulate and implement a more successful strategy
than that which has come to pass? Better yet, why hasn't your government
stepped in with a better solution? Impotence? KM
--
(-:alohacyberian:-) At my website there are 3000 live cameras or
visit NASA, play games, read jokes, send greeting cards & connect
to CNN news, NBA, the White House, Academy Awards or learn all
about Hawaii, Israel and more: http://keith.martin.home.att.net/
|