Disgruntled Customer wrote:
> "Stan de SD" enscribed:
>
>
>>that they would otherwise be happy to hire right away on "hold" until they
>
>
> Which often happen to be people who look like them. Hence the problem.
>
>
>>can shop around for more "minorities" to keep people such as yourself from
>
>
> God forbid you consider all qualified candidates instead of just the ones that look like you.
>
>
>>I guess being prejudiced against people who are not qualified is wrong, so
>
>
> How come people who don't look like you are never qualified?
>
Give it up. In my last case the administrator who mucked up the hiring
wanted a person who looked like him. The ones we wanted to consider
looked nothing like either me or the two persons who did the initial
screening. Bias works in many ways.
>
>>YOUR concept is definitely idiotic. You ignore the fact that there are
>>different levels of aptitudes, abilities, and even interest in given areas
>>among different groups, then scream "racism" when the outcome isn't
>
>
> Congress doesn't agree with you. The only people who agree with you are other bigots.
>
>
>>"representative". We once had an administrator at a community college who
>
>
> Colleges face a different situation than employers. You keep diverting by bringing up college issues to rationalize employment discrimination.
>
> --
> Feh. Mad as heck. |