"Disgruntled Customer" wrote in message
news:11b8792fm7e1bf@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stan de SD" enscribed:
>
> > that they would otherwise be happy to hire right away on "hold" until
they
>
> Which often happen to be people who look like them. Hence the problem.
An assumption on your part, unsubstantiated by evidence.
> > can shop around for more "minorities" to keep people such as yourself
from
See above...
> God forbid you consider all qualified candidates instead of just the ones
that look like you.
>
> > I guess being prejudiced against people who are not qualified is wrong,
so
>
> How come people who don't look like you are never qualified?
Do you have proof of that? Didn't think so.
> > YOUR concept is definitely idiotic. You ignore the fact that there are
> > different levels of aptitudes, abilities, and even interest in given
areas
> > among different groups, then scream "racism" when the outcome isn't
>
> Congress doesn't agree with you. The only people who agree with you are
other bigots.
Another fine example of Lefty Liberal circular reasoning...
>
> > "representative". We once had an administrator at a community college
who
>
> Colleges face a different situation than employers. You keep diverting by
bringing up college issues to rationalize employment discrimination.
No, I bring it up as an example of political correctness run amuck....
> Feh. Mad as heck.
No, stupid as hell...
|