Richard wrote:
> "Icono Clast" wrote:
>> pokerpin@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>> Reasonable proximity to other cities
>
>> Ah, well, the closest other city is farther than eight hundred
>> miles and you've already lived there.
>
> You're forgetting Los Angeles.
When did Los Angeles become a city?
Richard wrote:
> ...San Jose is the second or third largest city in California.
When did it become a city?
Peter L said:
> Los Angeles, San Diego then San Jose?
San Diego resembles a city. So does Portland.
Marianne said:
> Ah, but San Jose is not a city. It's an accumulation of
> subdivisions.
Just as Los Angeles.
Gary L. Dare said:
> I've been reading in the Mercury-News' siliconvalley.com that the
> area has been losing population ... has SF lost even more people,
> then?
Our population has fluctuated between 750-778 thousand since the
'50s. I don't know what'sit at the moment (see sig).
___________________________________________________________________
One of (as of 2003) 751,682 residents of San Francisco.
< http://geocities.com/dancefest/ >-< http://geocities.com/iconoc/ >
ICQ: < http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 > ---> IClast at SFbay Net |