In article , Bob Noel wrote:
> In article ,
> tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>
>> > Not in this case, the visibility isn't there until the car is at the stop
>> > sign.
>> > Prior to that point, you won't be able to see well enough to see a gap
>> > (especially in a small car). Think hill.
>>
>> So they reach that point and stop if no gap is present.
>
> I think you still aren't grasping that actual situation. Come look at
> ramps on 128 and then you should be able to understand the problem.
If you want to discuss specific ramps you need to be detailed.
>> >> Wether there is reason to justify poor design or not doesn't change my
>> >> statement.
>>
>> > If a design is justified, then it cannot be a poor design.
>>
>> It's still poor design.
> what? it can't a poor design if it's justified. by definition.
Yes it can. The constraints that forced it could be nonsencical, idiotic,
etc and so forth. Poor design may be the result of poorly made
constraints.
> [snip]
>> In chicago we have this material called steel.
> you have steel that you can see through?
Maybe you should have read the rest. But you probably did, and decided to
snip to try and look better.
|