Shawn Hirn wrote:
> Icono Clast wrote:
>> Shawn Hirn wrote:
>>> domtam@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>> we do not want to go back to Disneyland at California . . . I'm
>>>> thinking of Disney world at Orlando
>>
>> A great disappointment. 'Twas just a clone of DisneyLand. Universal
>> Studios in Orlando, however, is delightful, arguably the best of
>> its genre.
>
> Is this a troll?
An opinionator who differs from you is a troll? Grow up!
> Anyone who says Disney World is just a clone of Disneyland can't
> possibly have visited both places.
And ignorant.
> Disneyland has two theme parks:
No, DisneyLand is an entity in itself as is DisneyWorld. They're
virtually identical . . . at least the latter was when I visited.
> The original Magic Kingdom and California Adventure. Disney World in
> Orlando has the Magic Kingdom, but also MGM Studios, EPCOT, Animal
> Kingdom, two water parks, Islands of Adventure, Downtown Disney, and
> a considerably larger choice of hotels than Disneyland, plus a very
> nice campground facility.
That's Walt Disney World, a vast chunk of Florida, a quite dif'rent animal.
Patty Winter wrote:
> I first visited [DisneyLand] a year or two after it opened,
I think my first visit was the year or second of opening
> (Folks who grew up with WDW call it "small." :-))
>
> Anyway, DL and WDW are two *very* different places,
Yes, but DisneyLand and DisneyWorld, unless one's undergone significant
changes, are virtually identical.
> I wouldn't hesitate recommending WDW to someone who's looking for a
> theme- park experience and hasn't been there before.
Nor would I.
___________________________________________________________________
A roller-coaster freak in San Francisco.
< http://geocities.com/dancefest/ >-< http://geocities.com/iconoc/ >
ICQ: < http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19098103 > ---> IClast at SFbay Net |