On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 14:51:05 GMT, "Maxx"
wrote:
>"gel" wrote in message
>news:1153017427_30983@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
>> Ah! what's the point.
>The Points.
>1. State the facts without blowing them out of proportion;
The media have been reporting so many different stories about Edmonton
Police brutality - all of which are readable on the newspaper sites.
>2. Post a reasonable subject line.
Based on all the stories, the headers are correct.
>3. Posts credible back up links.
Why should links be posted. If you know how to use a browser, the
stories are easily readable.
>4. Post only to related groups.
>5. Don't flood the groups with multiple threads.
Thanks for all the interest you have stimulated in knowing about the
crooked Edmonton cops!
>> The cops beat up the weak. That is what i make of your protection of
>> the Edmonton cops that beated that man to death.
>I read that he swollowed his stash of cocaine. I haven't read otherwise.
>> My training as a federal officer would have make me handle that guy
>> with
>> no harm .I have extremely good training to handcuff fast and the first
>> action of me or any Feds on scene would have been to immediately call an
>> ambulance on a code of emergency.
>The aritcles I read did not say if this was done or not.
>> Even when we arrest we are train to save life.Especially in a minor
>> case of car theft.
>> Maxx are you Edmonton police officer.If so please their is no use to
>> protect the bad apples or the bad actions of officers.
>
>I'm not protecting anyone. I don't protect, or accuse without the facts.
>Do you see what has been done here? We just turned this into a dicussion.
>
|