National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




Re: With Global Warming A Fact.... Posted on: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:36:33 -0800

James Robinson spake thus:

> David Nebenzahl wrote:
>
>
>>sechumlib spake thus:
>>
>>
>>>Bolwerk said:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Harnessing wind seems like a fairly realistic approach for transit,
>>>>assuming there is a good source nearby.
>>>
>>>I don't get the impression wind provides enough power to get a transit
>>>vehicle farther than about a block.
>>
>>Why are you assuming that the transit vehicle would *only* run on wind?
>>That would be as ridiculous as assuming it could only run on dirty coal,
>>or nucular, or ...
>>
>>That's why there's this thing called an *energy mix*. Like so much from
>>fossil fuel, so much from solar, so much from wind, etc. All sources can
>>make their contribution. Once it's in the network, who cares where those
>>electrons came from?
>
> It's perfectly reasonable to assume that it can operate on one type of
> energy. The transit agency can contract with a specific supplier to
> provide the energy they require from a certain power plant or energy
> source. That is what energy deregulation is all about.

Yes, I stand corrected, although this situation only obtains in certain
places. Not currently here, in California, for residential customers. A
few years ago we *were* able to buy our electricity from designated
suppliers; I used to be a customer of Green Mountain Energy, before the
state pulled the plug on the choice program (and before the company went
belly up). Now PG&E's* the only game in town.

Also wanted to point out that contrary to someone's objections, wind
power can produce a lot more energy than flapping mouths on Usenet.
Serious energy, in the megawatts.


* Pure Greed & Extortion


--
Don't talk to me, those of you who must need to be slammed in the
forehead with a maul before you'll GET IT that Wikipedia is a
time-wasting, totality of CRAP...don't talk to me, don't keep bleating
like naifs, that we should somehow waste MORE of our lives writing a
variorum text that would be put up on that site.

It is a WASTE OF TIME.

- Harlan Ellison, writing on the "talk page" of his Wikipedia article
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Harlan_Ellison)

311939. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
311943. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
311944. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
311949. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312051. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312058. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312063. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312065. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312112. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312113. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312874. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312879. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312880. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312882. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312886. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312887. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312889. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312890. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312896. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....
312897. Re: With Global Warming A Fact....