"sechumlib" wrote in message
news:45dc4a73$0$4924$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> On 2007-02-21 07:22:55 -0500, "sharx35" said:
>
>>
>> "Dennis P. Harris" wrote in message
>> news:sjknt2la47612n65savp3hv9dfbj75j90r@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:40:31 -0800 in rec.travel.usa-canada,
>>> "Larry (Scratch)" wrote:
>>>
>>>> No, not actually some of us prefer to take the dollars the govt is
>>>> paying per child and use it to enter them in Private or home school yet
>>>> we are meeting with a lot of resistance. If the failed govt experiment
>>>> known as pubic screwls was so great, why the resistance? BECAUSE IT IS
>>>> NOT and parents recognize this and it is the kids that end of
>>>> suffering.
>>>
>>> oh, sure. the parents that can afford it send their kids to
>>> private school, leaving all the poor kids in inadequately funded
>>> schools in poor neighborhoods. unlike public schools, private
>>> schools are not forced to take those with behavior problems and
>>> learning disabilties, along with the disruptions they cause to
>>> all the other students.
>>>
>>> when parents actually take an interest in their children, or can
>>> spend the time needed with them because they aren't working 2 or
>>> 3 jobs just to keep a roof overhead and food on the table, much
>>> less get ahead or out of debt, kids do well. poor parents often
>>> can't do that.
>>>
>>
>> So, WHO forced THEM to get pregnant? Maybe if people started to THINK
>> before fornicating? Birth control....not having children if one can't
>> AFFORD to have children..what a concept!
>
> I guess you conclude NONE of them are married, right? Or maybe that poor
> people shouldn't be eligible for marriage?
I never said ANYTHING about the poor not marrying. I suggested that if you
CAN'T afford to RAISE a child, you should NOT get pregnant. Why is it that
LIEbrals and other DEMONrats think that reproduction should be subsidized by
others? THEIR orgasm. THEIR responsibility for raising the kid.
>
|