X-No-Archive:
On May 6, 11:32 am, S_MacCloud
wrote:
> bobandcarole wrote:
> > On Apr 22, 6:56?am, Borked Pseudo Mailed
> > wrote:
> > > Please comment on this! the last time it was posted only a few people saw it, so I am reposting it.
>
> > > "Overall, 81% of Canadians said that they considered pedophilia to be immoral. Of all the immoral behaviours listed by Leger Marketing, pedophilia - being .ually attracted to young children - had the highest rate of condemnation by Canadians."
> > > But flip the answer around, and we find a far more disturbing statistic. If 81% of Canadians think pedophilia is immoral, then 19% of Canadians either refused to answer or believe that pedophilia is, in fact, a moral behaviour. A good behaviour. One that should not be judged by society."
>
> > > From the _Edmonton Sun_ "Scary Statistics" article:
>
> > >http://www.edmontonsun.com/Comment/Commentary/2006/06/13/1628893.html
>
> > > EDITORIAL: Scary statistics!
>
> > > Looking at the "morality barometer" poll in yesterday's paper, we're struck by several things, the first being that Leger Marketing actually did a survey on how Canadians view a number of moral issues.
>
> > > This is remarkable insofar as the Canadian establishment continually tries to push moral and social issues off the table - witness the complete lack of debate in this country over controversial topics like abortion and gambling - claiming that Canadians are tolerant and understanding and non-judgmental and it's only closed-minded right-wingers from Alberta who are trying to push moral agendas on Canada.
>
> > > The other thing that struck us about the poll was how Canadians actually responded to the question, "Do you consider the following behaviour immoral?" with the pollster asking it over and over again with a new behaviour listed each time. It turns out that despite the reluctance of politicians to talk about moral issues and the even bigger reluctance of many journalists in this country to write about them, Canadians have no difficulties, when asked, categorizing certain behaviours as moral or immoral.
>
> > > Finally, the one thing that came leaping off the pollster report and hit us squarely between the eyes was the result to the question on how Canadians view pedophilia.
>
> > > Overall, 81% of Canadians said that they considered pedophilia to be immoral. Of all the immoral behaviours listed by Leger Marketing, pedophilia - being .ually attracted to young children - had the highest rate of condemnation by Canadians.
>
> > > But flip the answer around, and we find a far more disturbing statistic. If 81% of Canadians think pedophilia is immoral, then 19% of Canadians either refused to answer or believe that pedophilia is, in fact, a moral behaviour. A good behaviour. One that should not be judged by society.
>
> You mean it would judged as a 'good' by 'society'. Not unjudged. There is profit in doing 'good' things. That is why these 'modules' of making 'moral' decisions get passed on (selected by large complex pressures).
>
>
>
> > > That's almost one in five people in this country! That's creepy enough. It gets worse. Only 77% of Albertans said pedophilia is immoral, just two percentage points behind Saskatchewan and Manitoba, where the 75% condemnation was the lowest in Canada. Quebecers are actually the least tolerant of pedophilia, with a full 91% of them saying that it's immoral.
>
> > > The Leger poll also offers up a statistic that suggests Canada's tolerance of pedophilia will slowly grow with time, noting that older Canadians are far more likely to see the practice as immoral versus those in the 18- to 24-year-old crowd, where only 74% agreed lusting after pre-pubescent kids is wrong.
>
> 'pre pubescents'? Is that the actual question? Also 18 to 24s are young enough to see 'teens' as their class.
>
> Lastly, who cares? Why shouldn't females be married off young? How does it solve the human condition to extend puberty indefinitely? Why should female humans be given the power to hide in the profits of both worlds (fem . value and child protection on top of their female protection)?
>
> It is a female protection issue not a "ooh look at the young slice issue". It is created by the weirdo males as they fight like roosters to balance bio deterministic female .ual value by using the tactic of protectionist demagoguery politik to push out other males.
>
> Each generation it got worse until we have what we have now... A reality that has nothing to do with the original goals of any revolution fought anywhere ever and further a situation where the original goals are flauted as part and parcel of the slip-sloped distopia; meanwhile most pat themselves on the back like retards.
>
> The female motive is... they want power(more achievable once savvy adults) and they hide behind the goofy males who use this rooster trick of protection demagoguery. These goofs are 'profited' for their 'good' behavior accordingly.
>
> Anti 'pedophilia' is also the way the anti . prudes of yor couche their vibe. Ie they hide inside the rebuking of the 'immoral' practice so as to act-out their standard less socially acceptable anti . module.
>
> ----------
> Communize the cunt.
>
> Death to the peanut gallery. (defintion: testing and sterilization)
Does anyone understand any of this???????????????Anyone???????????? I
feel like I have just entered an alternate universe!
>
>
>
> > > Sure, this report doesn't mean that 19% of Canadians are pedophiles. But surely if there was one behaviour in this world that could be universally rebuked at a rate of 99% of higher, it would be pedophilia. Apparently not.
>
> > > It would seem that acceptance of pedophilia in Canada is already far more mainstream than most Canadians would have thought possible.
>
> > Ah Canada, the land that kisses the faggots asses and exports
> > a powerful strain of Marijuana. I'm not surprised at anything that
> > happens
> > there.
|