On Jun 17, 7:56 am, carol...@comcast.net (Carole Allen) wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:27:26 -0000, rst wrote:
> >If $300 a night for a hotel is an issue, I would not consider visiting
> >Manhattan. Try Philly or D.C. They probably have cheaper rates.
>
> Well, aren't you a little snob. We're not all made of endless sources
> of $$. Considering it's for sleeping and I'll be out most of the day
> and evening, $300 is too much, even for NYC. I have been to many
> major European cities and have stayed in lovely places that don't
> even approach the equivalent of $300/night.
I see you've already booked but next time you might try the
Cosmopolitan on Chambers, or Chelsea Lodge. I've stayed at both more
than once in the past few years.
Cheers,
George W Russell
Bangalore
|