"NotABushSupporter" wrote in message
news:uLCdnbQmALThQuHbnZ2dnUVZ_r-onZ2d@comcast.com...
> sharx35 wrote:
>
>> "NotABushSupporter" wrote in message
>> news:P_idnZTZ-9KzSuHbnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>>>sharx35 wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Once more, the law is an ass. Anyone with half a brain treats hot
>>>>beverages with DUE CARE AND ATTENTION.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Do you normally expect coffee to be scalding before you drink it?
>>>
>>
>>
>> I ASSUME that any hot beverage will be painfully hot until I find out
>> otherwise. Similarly, I assume that water is too shallow to dive in
>> UNTIL I check it out.
>>
>
> So, if the purchaser is not aware of anyone being hurt by the product and
> the seller is aware of at least 700 instances of someone being hurt by the
> product, you still find the purchaser to be solely at fault?
> (Note, in the decision, 20 percent of the blame was place on the
> purchaser)
So there were at least 700 idiot LIEbrawls blaming someone ELSE, always it's
someone else's FAULT, never theirs.
>
|
