wrote:
> carol...@comcast.net (Carole Allen) wrote:
> > proffsl
>
> > > Point A: I have stated, and proven, that courts have recognized
> > > our Right to Drive automobiles on our public highways:
>
> > That's ONE court, ONE state.
>
> However, the decision he is citing CONTRADICTS him.
You are such a LIAR.
Our Right to Drive automobiles (operate motor vehicles) on our public
highways has been recognized:
"The Idaho Supreme Court, however, has held that the right to operate
a motor vehicle on public highways is a matter of constitutional
dimension. In Adams v. City of Pocatello , 91 Idaho 99, 101, 416 P.2d
46, 48 (1966), the Court declared that the right to drive "is a right
or liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of
the federal and state constitutions. Consequently, the courts of this
state must regard the right to drive a motor vehicle on public
highways as constitutionally protected." - State of Idaho v. Mark
Wilder (2003) - http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/idahostatecases/app/1033/wilder.pdf
Clearly the Right to Drive automobiles (operate motor vehicles) on our
public highways has been recognized. Deny it if you wish to further
prove you are a foolish liar.
|