On 11/1/2009 10:12 PM, David Johnston wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:33:40 -0400, Al Smith
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/1/2009 12:56 PM, David Johnston wrote:
>>> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 03:02:19 -0400, Al Smith
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/31/2009 6:16 PM, TheNewsGuy(Mike) wrote:
>>>>> CBS Propaganda wrote:
>>>>>> ... Only half of the people in the
>>>>>> United States who most need immediate treatment for H1N1 swine flu are
>>>>>> actually seeking it,
>>>>> That's called "natural selection" - you know, like the thinning of the
>>>>> herd. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> Swine flu isn't much more dangerous than a bad headcold.
>>> Whens the last time a healthy 13 year old died of a bad headcold?
>>>
>>
>> It happens all the time, through infections and complications,
>
> Cite.
>
> or
>> due to existing weaknesses ... which is how people die from swine flu.
>
> Right. So then people who have absolutely no weaknesses are safe.
> Know anyone who has no weaknesses?
It's pointless to make an extra effort to protect ourselves against
something that isn't dangerous, and in the process risk a potential
side effect that may be much worse than the effect of the disease. I
do not trust what the government and so-called experts say about
vaccines. Not at all. These people are caught being flat out wrong
on science issues every day. When it comes to my own body, they
don't get to say, "Ooops, sorry, my mistake."
-Al- |